Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Still waiting for Cleanup in Foreclosure Mess

I came across an article of from Marian Wang at Propublica I would like to share:

If last year [1] was the year in which faulty foreclosures and bank errors became a full-blown scandal, this has been the year of waiting for something to be done about it.
First, there's the still-to-come multi-state settlement over alleged fraud on the part of the country's five largest mortgage servicers. That's the settlement being brokered by a coalition of state attorneys general and once touted [2] as homeowners' best bet for redressing banks' flaws in foreclosure and mortgage documentation. Over the past year, one story after another declared such a deal was imminent, but the details -- the total price tag [3], the deal's framework, and the expected date -- have continually been changing.
Earlier this month, the Des Moines Register reported Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller -- a point man for the attorneys' general probe -- as saying that the final deal should be complete before Christmas [4] and would include a measure to reduce the total debt owed by underwater homeowners. No deal has yet been announced. Miller wouldn't disclose a dollar figure on the size of the settlement -- or whether California, one of the hardest-hit states, would participate.
Over the course of the year, some state attorneys general seemed to lose faith in the coordinated effort, voicing concerns that the eventual settlement would be too easy on the banks.
California Attorney General Kamala Harris signaled her hesitation too [5], as did the attorneys general of New York [6], Delaware, Nevada, Massachusetts [7], Kentucky [8] and Minnesota [9]. These state attorneys general -- many of whom have filed their own suits against major servicers [10], foreclosure processing firms [11], and other players [12] -- questioned whether the settlement would limit their ability to take more aggressive action against foreclosure abuses in their states and either expressed doubts about whether they'd sign on to the final settlement or pulled out of the talks altogether.
Banks, meanwhile, have pushed for the settlement to include broader releases from legal liability over mortgage-related abuses. According to a recent Wall Street Journal piece, they've tried to make their participation in the settlement contingent on being shielded [13] from the possibility of lawsuits brought by the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.


Read more see posted at: http://www.propublica.org/article/still-waiting-for-cleanup-in-foreclosure-mess


For a free loan modification consultation go to http://www.jdssaysyes.com

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

FHA Refinance for Borrowers with Negative Equity

FHA Short Refinance.  If you are current on your mortgage, but owe more than your home is worth FHA Short refinance may be an option that your mortgage servicer will consider.  FHA Short Refinancea was designed to help homeowners refinance into more affordable, more stable FHA-insured mortgage. If your current lender agrees to participate in this refinance, they will be required to reduce the amount you owe on your first mortgage to no more than 97.75% of your home's current value.
For Eligibility and Progam Availability see Posted below website.

Posted:  http://www.makinghomeaffordable.gov/programs/lower-rates/Pages/short-refinance.aspx

For a free loan modification consultation go to http://www.jdssaysyes.com